[deleted] We currently have three sites with subnets, 192.168.0.0/24,192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24 Each network has a OpenVPN machine that connects as a client/tun and is assigned in the 10.9.0.0/24 range. This has worked well for the three networks since each one is located on their on network without any conflict. Until the fourth company is using the network 192.168.1.0/24. If I bring out a OpenVPN client/tun and only need to access a couple IP addresses that don't overlap with the other company, can't I just create separate routes to those machines on the new 192.168.1.0/24 network? route add 192.168.1.1 (Server on new network) mask 255.255.255.0 10.9.0.106 (new openvpn/client/tun) route add 192.168.1.150 (Server on old network) mask 255.255.255.0 10.9.0.104 (old openvpn/client/tun) Thanks.
Traffic Your idea seems to suggest that you only need access to one or two client side IP addresses not the entire subnet, so it is possible to do, provided none of the host IPs conflict. But the best solution is to manage your networks properly .. Also, there is --client-nat but again that is fraught with NAT complications.
[deleted] Okay. These connections will be established over the Internet, i.e., Comcast/FIOS. Let's say there is an IP on 192.168.1.1/24 that exists on 192.168.1.1/24 (new subnet), will Windows complain? I don't think the broadcasts are advertised over the tunnel that would cause Windows to complain that there was a duplicate IP address on the new subnet? Thanks.
Traffic techjohnny wrotewill Windows complain?You mean like a British Euro MP who is about to loose his Job ? You are trying to stick a square peg into a round hole ..
[deleted] Okay, Let's say: subnet 192.168.1.0 A has a server at 192.168.1.1 subnet 192.168.1.0 B has a server at 192.168.1.254 Can't I just add to the CCD files: A iroute 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 B iroute 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.255 ???
int3nt Traffic wrotetechjohnny wrotewill Windows complain?You mean like a British Euro MP who is about to loose his Job ?You called it .. :shock: I wonder what brexit will do now .. :lol: