hi, and thanks for your fast reply!
yes, it could be i am doing stupid things, just because i'm learning everyday... :-)
in fact, openvpn runs on another port, not the standard one but i don't see how that helps here?
i dont see a reason why on earth you need xinetd to call openvpn
i thought of this solution because the openpvn machine is not reachable from the internet! and i knew that xinetd could "forward" to another machine... it seemed quite easy and effective as a solution...
only the (in the middle) machine running revproxy, needed for web servers (an now also xinetd to forward openvpn traffic) is reachable!
maybe it is not clear, i have this setup:
internet--->firewall--->revproxy+xinetd--->openvpnmachine
i would like to do this
internet--->firewall--->openvpnmachine
but i can't do this because i cannot map an external ipaddress (i have no more free ipaddres atm) to the openvpn machine
one solution would be running openvpn on the same revproxy machine, but i liked the idea to have a separate openvpn server
another way i've found in the meanwhile could be what is suggested in the last comment here by "mgorven" (but quite a complicated one i think)
http://serverfault.com/questions/419783/iptables-how-to-redirect-forward-traffic-without-traffic-through-server
that said, i would like to learn best practices from anyone so feel free to suggest any idea!
Thanks, a lot, Marco